From Advertising Age: The Unique Profile of LGBT Affluents

Stat of the Day: the Unique Profile of LGBT Affluents

And Why This Population Is Attractive to Marketers

http://adage.com/article/adagestat/unique-profile-lgbt-affluents/229777/

Published: September 14, 2011

Affluents who describe themselves as members of the LGBT community have a distinctive profile — one that is particularly attractive to marketers and advertisers in a variety of categories.

According to data released earlier this week from the 2011 of the Ipsos Mendelsohn Affluent Survey, affluents who describe themselves as “members of the LGBT community” — lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered — are 25% higher in annual household income, and 16% higher in net worth. They also skew significantly younger, with an average age of 41.5; 43% are under the age of 35 (compared to 27% for the affluent population as a whole). While it might not seem too surprising, the LGBT affluent community is considerably more likely to describe themselves as “liberal” politically than the affluent population at large.

This is the 35th year the Affluent Study examined the lives, lifestyles, media habits and spending habits of affluent Americans (defined by us as those with at least $100,000 in annual household income).

Each year, we solicit our clients’ input on new survey topics, and segments of interest to them. Over the past few years, a growing number have requested that we add questions about sexual orientation, and in this article, we profile affluents who describe themselves as “members of the LGBT community” and compare them to the aAffluent population at large. Our survey of 14,405 affluents found that 2.4% of all affluents describe themselves in this way (an unweighted sample size of 259).

Any segment profile — whether it is based on generations, gender or affiliation with the LGBT community — is necessarily a collection of generalizations that are not necessarily true for every member of a segment. Having said that, members of the LGBT community show distinct signs of social and cultural leadership. They are more likely to vote, contact public officials and take an active role in social, political and environmental issues. Culturally, they are significantly more likely to attend live theater, museums, concerts and opera.

As such, many media companies will find the LGBT profile attractive as well: They spend more time on the internet, are more likely to read print publications across a variety of genres and are also more likely to use new media platforms such as smartphones and tablets.

Attitudinally, members of the LGBT community express a number of attitudes and marketplace preferences that should make them attractive to advertisers. They express an interest in new products and services, such as new foods and new wines. They also express an interest in design and luxury brands. Perhaps most important, they display a willingness to pay a premium for high-quality and/or environmentally-friendly brands that resonate with their attitudes and values.

The profile of the LGBT community that we have presented is obviously brief, and just scratches the surface of the demographic and lifestyle preferences of members of the LGBT community. We have not, for example, explored gender differences or age differences within members of the community, and there are no doubt other important sub-segments as well. The results of our market-profiling to date clearly show, however, a market profile that is both attractive to advertisers, and which we believe begins to replace the assumptions and stereotypes about this Affluent market segment with data-driven insights.

Profile of Affluent Members of the LGBT Community

Total Affluent Adults

Affluents in the LGBT community

Median age

45.8

41.5

Average household net worth ($000)

$980K

$1,134K

Average household income ($000)

$189K

$236K

Describe themselves as liberal

22%

59%

Voted in an election for public office

62

70

Wrote or emailed a public official

20

28

Took an active role in a civic, social, or political issue

13

25

Worked 10+ hours of a month for a non-political charitable organization

14

20

Took an active role in an environmental cause

6

13

Live theater performances

44

66

Museums

45

58

Music concerts

42

51

Art auctions/gallery exhibits

24

47

Live opera performances

4

12

Average # of hours on Internet weekly

33

39

Read print publications

82

89

Own a smartphone

61

70

Maintain a profile on a social networking site

48

61

Own a tablet

14

22

I like to try new foods

62

71

Climate change will affect my generation

45

62

I would be willing to pay more for products that are environmentally friendly

43

56

I consider myself an opinion leader

39

53

I like to try new and different wines

35

44

Paying more for organic foods is worth it

25

34

I prefer to buy organic or luxury brands

18

27

Among adults with $100,000 in annual household income.
Source: 2011 Ipsos Mendelsohn Affluent Survey.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Bob Shullman and Stephen Kraus are president and chief research and insights officer of Ipsos Mendelsohn, respectively. The Affluency column appears monthly on AdAgeStat.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s